English irregularities
Why is it that someone who practises astrology is not an astrologist? . . .that those studying theology are not theologers? . . .that one who studies biology is not a biologian?
27 November 2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Followers
Blog Archive
-
▼
2006
(281)
-
▼
November
(23)
- An African prelate for England?Dr. Rowan Williams ...
- Defending Cuban labour leadersEarlier this month t...
- I spoke too soon. . .Perhaps Turkey, with its poor...
- Turkish protestSome 25 thousand Turkish citizens s...
- English irregularitiesWhy is it that someone who p...
- Harper puts his foot in it tooThe Conservatives ha...
- Global solidarity expandedOn the first of this mon...
- Lebanon in crisisI suppose we are justified in ass...
- Norge-Bulgaria 10/11Given my ethnic Greek backgrou...
- Recent publicationsFor those interested, here are ...
- Vexillologist honoured by Queen's representativeTh...
- Wallis on religion and democracyThis is from last ...
- A change of heart?Rumour has it that my friend Gid...
- The lost art of cursive handwritingI was recently ...
- On hypocrisy . . . againFrom Robert T. Miller:A ma...
- 'Why are there wars?'As indicated some days ago, l...
- Big breakthroughThis might well be more significan...
- Ecclesial oversight . . . or the lack thereofThe T...
- In Canadian terms. . .George W. Bush now has a min...
- Hypocrisy: the unforgivable sin?To be honest, I ha...
- Which PR? Part IIIn my previous post on this topic...
- Why are there wars?At the Locke Street Festival so...
- Dijkema doingsI am pleased to announce that Mr. Br...
-
▼
November
(23)
No comments:
Post a Comment