A controversial decision
Could a court inadvertently contribute to a rise in violent crime? It's possible: Court rejects Washington, D.C., handgun ban. The Metropolitan Police will likely not be pleased.
10 March 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Followers
Blog Archive
-
▼
2007
(263)
-
▼
March
(23)
- 'War' in EuropeHow did our domestic media manage t...
- Ravel's G Major ConcertoThis is from a post I wrot...
- A watershed electionA new era has begun in Québec ...
- Speaking of Holland. . .Few North Americans are li...
- Holland turning the corner?The light of Christ con...
- A shorter book than plannedIn memory of my recent ...
- Liberty threatenedAre the traditional liberties en...
- PR for OntarioI just discovered today that my subm...
- A dark horse candidateFrançois Bayrou, leader of t...
- The end of BritainCould Tony Blair's policies, inc...
- Mediaeval tech support
- Prayer requestI have just returned from hospital w...
- A controversial decisionCould a court inadvertentl...
- Nicosia barrier dismantledThe internationally-reco...
- Un jet d'eau pour Hamilton?When in 1975 I visited ...
- EU candidate bolsters case for entryFirst the Arme...
- Parenthood times twoCongratulations are due to my ...
- Stay away from HogtownWe've had water seepage in o...
- St. Julius?The Roman Catholic bishops of Tanzania ...
- Overextended superpowerIs the United States, with ...
- Trudeau's Catholic influencesLast autumn I was inv...
- Third month; fourth snowdayMarch comes in like a l...
- St. David's DayIn the Greek-speaking world people ...
-
▼
March
(23)
No comments:
Post a Comment