Ending or defending discrimination?
There is more than one way to define discrimination, and this is evident in the debate south of the border over the faith-based initiative, which has become part of the current presidential campaign. Keith Pavlischek weighs in on the subject in The Weekly Standard: Doubting Obama: His faith-based initiative isn't what it's cracked up to be. Ironically, despite the longstanding libertarian element in the Republican Party, it is the Democrats who are now taking the narrowly individualist approach to the issue. Stanley Carlson-Thies offers his own Memo to Presidential Candidates on "how to get the faith-based initiative right." Let's hope Obama and McCain will read this.
20 July 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Followers
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(172)
-
▼
July
(13)
- Copy-editing 101Rule # 14: Eliminate ambiguous mea...
- Compassion as a virtue?Clifford Orwin has given us...
- Authority and hierarchy, IIThis is a follow-up to ...
- July snippetsTaking us from Nicosia to Amsterdam t...
- Hungarian Reformed ChurchI have posted in my sideb...
- Ending or defending discrimination?There is more t...
- A grim anniversaryOn the 90th anniversary of the m...
- Post-holiday postmortemOur family just returned fr...
- Price rises and eating localThis report perplexes ...
- Suburban air qualityIt has long been assumed that ...
- Misplaced honour, part 2The controversy continues:...
- Theodore Plantinga (1947-2008)Redeemer has just po...
- Misplaced honourOur own Sir Frederick Banting was ...
-
▼
July
(13)
No comments:
Post a Comment