The Crown and the constitution
The Queen is in Australia this week where, among other things, she will open the Commonwealth Games in Melbourne.
Coincidentally, I have been reading Edward McWhinney's The Governor General and the Prime Ministers: The Making and Unmaking of Governments. Now that Canada is in a second minority government situation in nearly as many years, McWhinney's book is especially timely. His treatments of the King-Byng constitutional crisis of 1926, the Whitlam Dismissal of 1975, the defeat of Joe Clark's government in 1979 and other events of constitutional import are readable and informative. (On the other hand, the book appears to have been rushed into print. There are errors in his account, most notably in his treatment of the changes of government in Ontario between 1985 and 1990.)
Because I came of age in the US at precisely the moment when a presidency had become incapacitated, I can appreciate the value of a division of labour between head of state and head of government characteristic of many polities, including Canada. At the same time, I do tend to wonder whether the governor general's office here constitutes a sufficient check on the vast powers of the prime minister. It would not be a bad thing to see a governor general act somewhat more resolutely to keep the PM in line. However, as long as she or he is effectively appointed by the PM himself, this is not likely to occur.
13 March 2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Followers
Blog Archive
-
▼
2006
(281)
-
▼
March
(38)
- Yet another red letter dayToday marks the first an...
- Ignatieff in the raceWe've all seen it coming: Ign...
- Many happy returns of the dayBirthday greetings ar...
- Seasonal musicOn the first nice spring day I love ...
- An 'oily' conservative?What is a "crunchy" conserv...
- Canada's (third-)world-class postal systemSending ...
- Maltese tribute to unbornHere's an uplifting repor...
- Religious freedom and IslamWestern pressure has ap...
- Divorce at last?After being together for 45 years,...
- Peacemakers' rescue: aftermathThere is perhaps som...
- And when she's not critiquing my wardrobe. . .Sour...
- Russia aided Saddam?If the following story is true...
- Tim's conquers North AmericaQuick, call your broke...
- Misnomer?Why is this contraption I'm typing on kno...
- Catholic Democrats' statement flawedFr. Thomas Wil...
- Princeton Seminary openingNow that Max Stackhouse ...
- Miraculous deliveranceThank God for answering the ...
- Visions and Illusions in IllinoisScroll down the w...
- Perhaps Theresa was rightDaddy's dreaded vest
- Defending 'justice' in Afghanistan?Could Canadian ...
- The last Soviet strongholdWhat? We are shocked! s...
- Cyclone LarryIf you're visiting Australia, here's ...
- From my severest fashion criticSource: Theresa Koyzis
- Domain changeSome readers may have noticed from th...
- Demography and 'patriarchy'My good friend Richard ...
- Alumni newsI am pleased to announce that three alu...
- The Crown and the constitutionThe Queen is in Aust...
- Loving ordinatelySpeaking of John Buchan, Gideon S...
- I wonder. . .. . . whether James W. Skillen and Ed...
- Liberties threatenedConstitutional guarantees are ...
- Roe v. Wade plus 33Amherst College Professor Hadle...
- Nassif on OrthodoxyBradley Nassif teaches theology...
- FamagustaSomeone has posted video footage of a vis...
- Yum, goodI sometimes wonder whether, some four dec...
- We have a winnerThe only real reason to pay attent...
- Speaking of . . .. . . Notre Dame, a well-known ev...
- Prophetic Politics Goes to Washington?Timothy Sher...
- Monaghan's city on a hillPizza magnate Tom Monagha...
-
▼
March
(38)
No comments:
Post a Comment