The need for democracy is satisfied by giving citizens a choice between two or more candidates thoroughly vetted by their respective party organizations and presented to the people as the best persons for the job. The aristocratic principle—necessary in all political systems—should come into play within the parties themselves as would-be candidates are screened in accordance with established criteria to insure a high level of competence and personal integrity. Only then would they be brought before the public for their verdict.
08 January 2021
The Tempering of Democracy
Five years ago I wrote something for First Things which I believe continues to have relevance for today, especially after the events of two days ago: The Tempering of Democracy: How Recovering the Classical Mixed Constitution Could Affect the Way We Vote. Attempting to more thoroughly democratize a constitution can backfire and lead to would-be authoritarian leaders coming out on top. An excerpt:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Followers
Blog Archive
-
▼
2021
(125)
-
▼
January
(19)
- A path away from Kant?
- Misreading Kuyper? Stewart, Hawley, and The New Yo...
- Context appearance
- Defending ordinary politics: video commentary
- Defending ordinary politics: Crick's contribution
- Madison's nightmare
- Capitol Hill Insurrection
- The Emperor and the Bible
- Cultural dysfunction and public policy
- Mauldin's grieving Lincoln
- Six Cents Report
- The Tempering of Democracy
- Common Good conversation: uprising aftermath
- Capitol Hill insurrection: the day after
- Barbara Martha Calvert (1935-2020)
- Rod Dreher's jeremiad
- Innes: Christ and the Kingdoms of Men, a review
- Link for American donors
- Matt Crummy's 'Six Insightful Reads'
-
▼
January
(19)

No comments:
Post a Comment