What? No more ad hominem?
Can it be true? The New Pantagruel is closing shop. And so soon after this. I don't think we're in Kansas anymore, Toto.
22 September 2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Followers
Blog Archive
-
▼
2006
(281)
-
▼
September
(23)
- The Pope was wrongWhat better way to demonstrate t...
- Baptists becoming Reformed?More than two decades a...
- A Tory on fraternityHegel's ideas are alive and we...
- Church notesThis morning our family was privileged...
- God and the welfare stateRemember Lew Daly's Compa...
- What? No more ad hominem?Can it be true? The New P...
- Artificial happiness?I must admit to being ambival...
- ArchitectureFrom ages 6 to 14 I aspired to become ...
- At the edge of the solar systemIt's official: Dwar...
- Reaction to Pope's speechPope Benedict XVI was unw...
- Marketing the churchWhat happens when worship beco...
- Marshall on evangelical activismMy friend Paul Mar...
- Lessons from the AntipodesDo we Canucks have somet...
- A word to the wiseIf any of my students dares to w...
- Five years laterUniversity of FloridaLest we forge...
- Crossing the TiberProf. Ian Hunter, who has spoken...
- A budding musician in our household?Is it unusual ...
- GileadLast week I read Marilynne Robinson's Pulitz...
- Needed reform on the wayThis is good news: Harper ...
- What if they gave a world and nobody came?Given th...
- The europeanization of American politics?Is the po...
- Warren on 'chestlessness'Canada's own David Warren...
- Confessing 'sin'?Last week I worshipped at a local...
-
▼
September
(23)
No comments:
Post a Comment