The Notwithstanding Clause
Paul Martin has gone and done it. In last evening's debate he promised a constitutional Amendment to End Federal Ability to Invoke Notwithstanding Clause. Is this really "the boldest defence of rights and freedoms in Canada since the creation of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms in 1982"? Or is it an abdication of responsible government and a concession to American-style judicial supremacy? According to The Potent Pew, Martin himself has not been consistent on this point. Will this new initiative win him more votes? Stay tuned.
10 January 2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Followers
Blog Archive
-
▼
2006
(281)
-
▼
January
(22)
- Coretta Scott King (1927-2006)The widow of the lat...
- Worth reading. . .. . . is this thoughtful analysi...
- Antipodean sojourn III: the skies and seasonsOne o...
- Two thumbs (mostly) upIs it possible to be New Age...
- Antipodean sojourn II: the natural environmentThe ...
- A realistic possibility?Might David Sweet, Jim Fla...
- Peace eludes Middle East once moreThis is little s...
- Pope extols God's loveBenedict XVI has published t...
- Antipodean sojourn: Transforming educationAs promi...
- Harper wins. . . or does he?After a dozen years in...
- The Antipodes and backYesterday I returned from ne...
- Stop the pressesStephen Harper has come clean and ...
- The party leaders on religion and public lifeThe E...
- Steyn on the west's declineWestern civilization ha...
- The Notwithstanding ClausePaul Martin has gone and...
- The once and future labour unionI seem to have mis...
- An exception to the Charter's failures?Russ Kuyken...
- Think beyond IraqDr. Stanley Carlson-Thies, Direct...
- Quebeckers munch on their own pastFr. Richard John...
- Setback for educational justiceThis is bad news fo...
- Two historic defeatsThe following is a slightly al...
- Holland breaks ground once againFor those who pers...
-
▼
January
(22)
No comments:
Post a Comment